Getting My h4831sc load data To Work
Getting My h4831sc load data To Work
Blog Article
What's Absolutely everyone having excellent accuracy with for 180gr tablets and 4831? Just trying to find a place to begin so I don't waste lots of elements. Many thanks for the assistance!
I have utilized H4831 (and H4831SC), and I use it. There are not lots of cartridges which i utilize it for as I seem generally to gravitate to other powders. On the other hand, I can't state that it isn't going to do the job. It is simply that some other powders perform far better for the presented cartridge. For instance, within the 280, H4831 gave me great velocity and really great teams with Nosler 140 AB. Nevertheless, RL19 was marginally much better in precision, though the velocity was practically equivalent.
Can they be interchanged without worries other then employing standard load methods when switching from ton to great deal?
Certainly you are able to. They are the exact same actual powder however the SC powder is simply Slice shorter so it meters superior.
Yup or it would not function properly. And Considering that the OP contains a load utilizing Varget I'd consider to discover a person to trade with. May come up with a earn get predicament.
Liberalism; The unattainable yet acknowledged notion that it's solely feasible to choose up a turd because of the clean end.
I have utilized each and employed the exact same expenses and have not been capable of explain to any noticable distinctions with performance. the SC Variation meters a little bit smoother is about all. any opinions??
In fact, It is really h4831 vs h4831sc even a smart idea to back again down and perform up safely when you go from a person good deal to another lot of the identical powder.
Presently working with IMR 4831 within a 300WSM, and find out the H4831sc is a well-liked choice for this caliber and yields a bit more velocity. Aside from it remaining brief Slice, what's the real difference in both of these powders, and may I switch to H4831sc?
Why would I mention this? Just what exactly is my issue? I am undecided that there's a genuine valid level besides what's well-known h4831sc load data with most has not been well-known with me in any way in these circumstances. Do I just Possess a powder jinx or one thing? Simply to provide you with how mad I h4831sc load data really am, tomorrow I am variety testing a friends new .
As for that 4831 vs 4831SC, They can be exactly the same/equivalent powder cept for grain measurement. Load data is interchangeable.
It is really possible that no even further dialogue is required, during which scenario we endorse starting a brand new thread. If nonetheless you're feeling your reaction is necessary you could still do so.
I know the H4831SC provides an even better load density But I do think I've adequate area in my situation for the conventional H4831.
I sawed one particular in 50 % to find out how thick the jackets ended up, and they have been quickly twice as thick like a fifty-grain hollow issue was. Ditto for the 64-grain Electric power Point, as these bullets are constructed for deer, not prairie puppies or woodchucks. You now know all the things I know about the 22-250 and slow-burning powders, and I don't know nearly anything in the slightest degree regarding the 223. I doubt that you're going to get anywhere with that cartridge and 4831, but let us know how it goes.